The title of this post comes from a verse in Paul’s letter to the Romans where he describes the faith of Abraham as “hoping against hope”, (Rom. 4:18).
It is a curious phrase. What does it mean to hope against hope?
The simplest way to understand it is that hoping against hope is “hoping for something that is most likely an impossibility.” Or we could think about it in terms of two kinds of hope. That is, what Paul has in mind is one kind of hope hoping against another kind of hope.
“Natural” Hope
The first type of hope we can describe as a “natural” hope. The kind of hope we have when January rolls around or when we enter a new stage in life. In sports, it is the hope that springs eternal at the start of every new season. We have an expectation that what lies ahead promises something better than what we have today. Hope is born when we marry this expectation with the belief that we have what it takes to bring about that better future.
This kind of hope is largely about reaching a desired outcome and having the grit to overcome any obstacles that come our way. It is tied up with our capacity to attain what we set out to accomplish and our fortitude to persevere through adversity. When the chips are down, hope names our persistence to believe we can still achieve our goals.
Really, this is akin to how we usually think about optimism.
And so optimism, we might say, is the kind of hope we are called to hope against.
“Unnatural” Hope
This second kind of hope is not like optimism in that it is not “natural.” The desired outcome we hope for does not naturally emerge from the character of the present. We do not hope for something that can be reasonably extrapolated from current conditions. Rather our hope is in a future good that only God can give to us. In this way, Christian hope is “unnatural.” Or rather, it is super natural. Super, simply meaning, “above or beyond.” The hope that hopes against hope is a hope that goes beyond or above optimism.
This kind of hope hopes not only when the chips are down, but even when optimism has lost all reason to hope. It is here where hope is just getting started. Hope begins where optimism ends.
In this way, hope is made possible by faith. As the Apostle Paul would have it, hope is born in the presence of the God in whom we believe, “who gives life to the dead and calls into existence the things that do not exist,” (Rom. 4:17). So to hope against hope is to not allow our hope to be dictated by positive circumstances or limited by the promise of human progress. To hope against hope is to keep the hope even when we no longer have sufficient reasons to do so. We hope against what the present data tells us.
Hope is a Hard Ask
And this, of course, is what makes hope so hard. We live in a time where our vision of what is possible is entirely shaped by the hope that science, technology, and reason possess within themselves the capacity to make all things new (but mostly we just end up with all new things). And so, our default setting as a culture is to look askew at any hope that hopes above or beyond what can be achieved through human ingenuity and empirical know-how. We dismiss it as naive or Pollyannaish.
Even as a person of faith, it is difficult to shake the all too glaring question, “What’s the point of hoping for something you can’t accomplish or achieve by your own effort?” At best, it encourages an ineffectual passivity as we bide our time for the great by and by. At worst, it is delusional and traps us in an endless cycle of denial.
These are questions we’ll want to explore in the coming posts.